national and international security

The propeace community needs to begin articulating its vision of peace and nonviolence as vital components of national and international security. In these heightened times, simply asking "can't we all just get along?" is not enough. It is an ideal toward which we work. But clearly we are not all getting along. There are threats and incursions to peace every day. While it is important that we don't take a fearful posture, the propeace community must still address these threats and incursions. It would be irresponsible not to.

Angry mobs of disenfranchised youth. Ethnic cleansing. Violent suppression of expression and dissent. Racial intolerance. Domestic violence. Wars of aggression. How does the propeace community address threats to national and international security? How does the propeace community protect the citizens of the world? These are responsibilities of leadership. If the propeace community is to lead, then it must embrace these responsibilities.

The societal transformation we envision will not be adopted quickly. But its adoption will be hastened if we become better able to articulate why it should be adopted. Conservative philosophy understandably puts the brakes on any societal or cultural change that is simply for the sake of change. It resists any break from the moral and traditional code refined over countless generations and entrusted to us for safekeeping and propagation. Talk of transformation threatens this priceless inheritance. There are many cherished things worth keeping, and we have to be able to explain why our shift in consciousness is the best way to protect the cherished and evolve the obsolete.

Finally, we must be able to identify the moral underpinnings of this movement. Everything we do must be rooted there. I know that this community has a deep sense of what is right and what is wrong, and we must lose our fear of making those judgments and discriminations. At the most basic level, I believe that what is right is what draws human beings together in cooperation and harmony, and what is wrong is what creates divisions, isolation and paranoia. The underpinning of the propeace community is healthy human relationship. That includes how we relate to human beings with whose actions we do not agree or with whose ideologies we cannot relate. Policies that build bridges and find commonalities are right. Policies that separate, isolate and marginalize are wrong.

To build national security we must foster human security. Humans feel secure when their basic needs are met and, being socialized animals, they feel they are accepted into the pack. Any threat to this basic human security is a threat to national and international security. The more human beings that have their needs met and are engaged in productive, healthy relationships, the greater our national and international security will be. And again, a productive, healthy relationship can be full of disagreement and ideological difference. What makes it productive and healthy is tolerance, communication, connection, spirited exchange and humility.

A strong military is also key to national and international security. Part of our nature is that of warrior. Warriors can be proud of their elite training. Their fearlessness of death does not imply their desire to be sent to die, regardless of how willingly they would do so. We can honor the warrior through training, military exercises, humanitarian work and medals of honor and achievement, without engaging in warfare. The strength and protection provided by having a military force is honorable, while the use of military force to settle difficulties is almost always pure folly. We must not be afraid to NOT use military force to solve our difficulties. And we must trust and encourage other countries in a similar fearlessness. Strength is in restraint and patience and trust.

National and international security can and must have a place in the propeace community. Security must enter into our dialog and into our policies. It is up to us to break the grip of fear that is choking the world, and we can only do so if we offer our love cloaked in security.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Re: national and international security

MTOLincoln wrote:
The ideas and solutions have to come from us, their followers. Our leaders lead far too busy a life putting in appearances, running from place to place, attending fundraisers, planning how to get reelected, attending to the demands of powerful donors to ever have time or peace of mind to reflect seriously, or ponder those who do, to actually come up with solutions for the pressing problems of war and peace in our time.

This is a representative democracy. Many of our elected officials are supposed to represent we the people. We are mistaken to expect them to lead. They should follow. And that is why it is of paramount importance that we become much more articulate about national security and many other issues. Unless we give the people something to follow, we will not see our ideas enacted.

Other elected officials, such as the chief executives are supposed to lead. They should be visionaries. They should be able to articulate their vision clearly. They should be able to articulate the actions they will carry out to realize their vision. Their actual actions should support their vision.

When people elect a chief executive, they are selecting a vision of the world and an individual capable of following through on that vision. If we are to see a wider propeace community then we need to articulate a comprehensive vision and a means of achieving that vision.

The last presidential election was won by the warmaker with the clear, easily understood vision and the actions that backed up that vision. It was lost by someone who could not articulate his position simply and clearly. It was lost by someone who did not have a record of following through on the vision that was so inarticulately unclear.

The lesson: never misunderestimate the power of a simple, clear vision, conviction and action.

MTOLincoln wrote:
One way we could all take a step to begin, however, would be to do what I suggested earlier on this site, to begin by forming problem-solving conversational circles in which people put their heads together, focus on a key problem, look for solutions, and for actions they could engage in as individuals that might help our country move toward a more peaceful solution of our present and future conflicts. E.g., see Peace Circles

This would be a small step, but would help create a matrix throughout the country that is supportive of and evocative of the eventual emergence of creative solutions and a more widespread public awareness of peaceful alternatives to militaristic stances in our foreign policies.

You identify two important components of what we have before us. First, putting our heads together to find solutions. And second, to create a matrix (or network) that can bring the best solutions forward. A third important component is that we need a suitable leader type personality to emerge to drive the enactment of the solutions.

Many thanks,
Jason.

Re: national and international security

Jason White wrote:
The propeace community needs to begin articulating its vision of peace and nonviolence as vital components of national and international security. In these heightened times, simply asking "can't we all just get along?" is not enough.

How does the propeace community address threats to national and international security? How does the propeace community protect the citizens of the world? These are responsibilities of leadership.


Jason, I couldn’t agree with you more. Thank you for your thoughtful post, and for your own leadership.

E.J. Dionne was just writing in the Washington Post about how we can’t expect our political leaders to provide leadership. [Quote=Dionne] ...a central fact of American politics: "New ideas," "bold visions," "detailed solutions" and "courageous policies" almost never originate with politicians, especially politicians in the middle of election campaigns. Political consultants, with a few honorable exceptions, don't do "vision" either.

Politicians typically pick up their ideas from intellectual entrepreneurs, professional visionaries and impatient ideologues who wonder why the parties they support seem to stand for little.

The ideas and solutions have to come from us, their followers. Our leaders lead far too busy a life putting in appearances, running from place to place, attending fundraisers, planning how to get reelected, attending to the demands of powerful donors to ever have time or peace of mind to reflect seriously, or ponder those who do, to actually come up with solutions for the pressing problems of war and peace in our time.

And so we see, the war continues, the same policies that caused the war continue, with no genuine end or plan in sight that would genuinely resolve the problem.

One way we could all take a step to begin, however, would be to do what I suggested earlier on this site, to begin by forming problem-solving conversational circles in which people put their heads together, focus on a key problem, look for solutions, and for actions they could engage in as individuals that might help our country move toward a more peaceful solution of our present and future conflicts. E.g., see Peace Circles

This would be a small step, but would help create a matrix throughout the country that is supportive of and evocative of the eventual emergence of creative solutions and a more widespread public awareness of peaceful alternatives to militaristic stances in our foreign policies.

Respectfully,

M. O'Brien